Some people use the Internet for medical help instead of going to see the doctor Why Is it a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Some people use the Internet for medical help instead of going to see the doctor. Why? Is it a positive or negative development?

Some people prefer to seeking medical advice online to have a proper check-up with the doctor. Personally, the convenience that it grants people leads to the existence of this phenomenon. However, I endorse the hypothesis that this development is negative for its different levels of disadvantages.
Regarding the reason, people are increasingly seeking medical advice from the Internet for its superior convenience. In fact, many free forums are established to provide people with answers about medical problems. In this way, individuals can gain access to medical help at any time despite their whereabouts and take the immediate solution for their conditions. Consequently, this technological development renders the prevalence of searching for advice for ones’ diseases and symptoms from the Internet.
About the phenomenon, I hold the idea that it is significantly detrimental for two main reasons. Specifically, as individuals may lack proper knowledge about their illnesses or symptoms, their description can be erroneous, resulting in the misdiagnosis of one’s condition. Besides, since there is no available method to verify the quality or accuracy of the advice provided online, individuals' action of following such advice can aggravate their illnesses, affecting their health detrimentally. Consequently, it is not optimal to seek medical advice online.
To conclude, despite controversial schools of thought on determining the cause and impacts of using the Internet for medical help, I endorse the hypothesis that this phenomenon is negative. While it helps to save time and money for the users, there is no guarantee that such advice can improve individuals’ illnesses.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-05-15 @hoangnguyen 61 view
Essays by user @hoangnguyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seek'?
Suggestion: seek
Some people prefer to seeking medical advice online to have a proper ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, however, if, may, regarding, so, while, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69960474308 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17108394825 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584980237154 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6280676173 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.923076923 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242471273605 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091807872318 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605044140938 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160998393326 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777096987452 0.056905535591 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.