Some people may end up working for one organization for their whole life whereas others opine that it's useful to work for different entities. In my view, engagement with different companies makes the learning curve better as well your social circle gets widened which is the overall development of a person. In the next two paragraphs, I will discuss both views.
First of all, single employment throughout life is very boring and unchallenging. Staying in the same company doesn't give a chance to an employee to explore new technologies and they always keep doing things in outdated fashion and at the same time, there is no motivation due to the lacking innovation. Moreover, people adopt their comfort zone while being in the same organization, so they don't learn anything new. Also, social life is very limited because you would only know one company people throughout your life.
At the same time, switching companies over time is a great way to get hands-on latest tech stacks. You get to know about various new and upgraded versions of numerous things, which increases your knowledge day by day. Apart from that, getting into various workplaces makes you more sociable as you get to know a number of people in your lifetime. For instance, I am known to more than 200 people presently as compared to my cousin who only knows 30 persons because he hasn't switched any company but I have changed 5 organizations.
To sum up, being employed in the same entity for life doesn't enhance your skills and also your social life is compromised whereas employment with new organizations gives you exposure to updated technologies and you are more social as well.
- Schools do not do enough to teach students about their health. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- Billions of dollars are spent on space research This is a waste of money More money must be spent on improving the problem of people on earth To what extent do you agree 75
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 78
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 56
- In some countries more and more adults choose to continue to live with their parents after they graduate and have found jobs Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...mpanies makes the learning curve better as well your social circle gets widened wh...
^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hallenging. Staying in the same company doesnt give a chance to an employee to explore...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 392, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...being in the same organization, so they dont learn anything new. Also, social life i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...in who only knows 30 persons because he hasnt switched any company but I have changed...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ng employed in the same entity for life doesnt enhance your skills and also your socia...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, for instance, first of all, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90747330961 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64397244528 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626334519573 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3960568665 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.916666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265303804553 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898047812016 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964528449412 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169574840618 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120495667857 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.