In some places, young people find it difficult to communicate with older people. Why is this? What are the solutions?
When it comes to communicate with others, one of the tough relationships for human-beings could be with people who are not in the same age with them. This issue has had several reasons such as having various hobbies and interests which will be explained in this essay. And also possible solutions in order to solve this concern will be mentioned as well.
To commence with, one of the significant causes of this difficulty which youngsters have had hard time to connect with older people have been their various hobbies. That is based on the main principle of human’s interactions which has been their similarity absorption to amuse themselves. However, young people have been fond of being more energetic or doing adventurous actions such as hiking, diving into water older people have not been able to do these activities. This is because of old people not only disability to do such exciting activities even if they have a keen to do it, but also the alteration in their behavior which has led them to enjoy more relaxing ones. Consequently, this has propelled people with various age group to not have any stimulation to associate with each other because they cannot do the same activities.
To addict, in order to solve the discomfort of young and old individuals’ connection, there have been several solutions that could be taken. Although individuals with diverse ages have been interested in various activities, one of the effective keys could be to create similar activities by regarding both of their interests. In fact, these created hobbies should contain adventurous ones but with lower movement which older people could be able to join them. For example, swimming in average depth pools where not only young people could do breathtaking events like diving or jet skiing, but also old people could be swim or even walk in the swimming pool. As a result, even though they will be doing various actions, they may be more flexible to befriend with one other.
In conclusion, even individuals with same ages have had diverse interests which has led them to not be able to communicate with each other. But this differences have been more obvious when it comes to too much age deference between people. To give reasons for this issue, one considerable one has been their extremely diverse interests. Moreover, one of the main solution of this issue could be to engender some activities which will be based on both of their preferences.
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 83
- In many countries people throw away a lot of food from restaurants and shops Why do you think people waste food in this way What can be done to reduce the amount of food thrown away 73
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstance of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when declining on the punishment D 67
- countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- Throughout history people have dreamed of living in a perfect society but they have not agreed on what an ideal society would be like What do you think is the most important element of a perfect society in the modern world How can people work towards achi 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96601941748 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65495373562 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456310679612 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3794217037 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.352941176 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2352941176 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225613237645 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892117701986 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542394473271 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160957197721 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343747046628 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.