Some say that for any country hosting an international sports events such as the Olymoic games is costly, inefficient and is a waste of money, while others disagree.discuss bothe views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some say that for any country hosting an international sports events such as the Olymoic games is costly, inefficient and is a waste of money, while others disagree.discuss bothe views and give your opinion.

Every country has its own reason as to bid worldwide sports event. Olympic games is a prime example. It is often argued that such games are money wasting expensive and even not efficient, while others not agree with this point of view. In my opinion, I disagree that, globally organized sports events are beneficial for the economy not only hosting country but also all over the world. This essay will discuss both judgements as well.
It is clear that the well-planned theme for these types of activities makes nation's pride, financial benefit and tourism, that will be a positive impact rather than opponent's views. In other words, fans, or visitors those who are coming in Olympic city would publish their experience in hostess traditional cultures, foods as well as tourist zones, which would likely to have their economic value in higher position even after the event. For example, one of the Olympic city as Sydney had risen Australian tourism standard and economy after the Olympic games than before.
On the other hand, many disagree and feel that such programmes have negative consequences. As their perspective, government are spending huge amount for such sports event and, which is incompetent as well. Despite this, a well organization committee can disburse money for certain concerned areas namely hostage facilities, accompanied with tourist zones, tax for some services, proper selection of game field and so on. Therefore, hosting country can get back money which they spend. For instance, 2016 Rio Olympic make Brazil's infrastructure and standard of economy than previous years.
To conclude, international based sports events are insisted to put more money on that; nevertheless, having a well management team can survive such adverse ramifications by respective field volunteers. However, as long as worldwide sports event leaders should be wary of this, there are no chance to blame on cost or money wastage.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-02-28 Harsharan Kaur Gill 61 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... has its own reason as to bid worldwide sports event. Olympic games is a prime example...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of view. In my opinion, I disagree that, globally organized sports events are ben...
^^
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erience in hostess traditional cultures, foods as well as tourist zones, which wo...
^^
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ition even after the event. For example, one of the Olympic city as Sydney had ri...
^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncerned areas namely hostage facilities, accompanied with tourist zones, tax for ...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to put more money on that; nevertheless, having a well management team can surviv...
^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...lunteers. However, as long as worldwide sports event leaders should be wary of this, t...
^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'as well as', 'in my opinion', 'in other words', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.289398280802 0.247107183377 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.126074498567 0.155533422707 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100286532951 0.0946595960268 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0659025787966 0.0501214627716 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.025787965616 0.0437548338989 59% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123209169054 0.122226691241 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0343839541547 0.0403226058552 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63419441745 2.80594681477 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0143266475645 0.0326793684256 44% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00286532951289 0.00163938923432 175% => OK
Determiners: 0.0659025787966 0.0861772015684 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0229226361032 0.021408717616 107% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0143266475645 0.011925033212 120% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1939.0 1933.35771543 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 316.048096192 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25483870968 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383870967742 0.374742101984 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28064516129 0.28420135186 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183870967742 0.203846283523 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11935483871 0.137316102897 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63419441745 2.80594681477 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.037074148 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641935483871 0.56093040696 114% => OK
Word variations: 77.0728988535 60.7387585426 127% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6666666667 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4786541326 49.517814964 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.266666667 127.492653851 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.06666666667 0.814263465372 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.99599198397 175% => OK
Readability: 48.7311827957 49.1944974215 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.05263157895 1.69124875643 121% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358773119517 0.332605444948 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.068063657267 0.102741220458 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0525163914576 0.0668466124924 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.462196204377 0.534860350844 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.145762057362 0.148594505496 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125064855691 0.134430193775 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535251434896 0.0742795772207 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.229659529856 0.324371583561 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0334781087429 0.0638462369009 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224693582204 0.228012699653 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821953733288 0.058150111329 141% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 1.9629258517 204% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.