The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts compares, producing electricity by the five sources such as, coal, petroleum, natural gas, nuclear and hydro power in two countries namely, New zealand and Germany over the years of 1980 and 2010.

Overall, it has been clear that, Germany producing more electricity than New zealand over the period given. At once, In 2010, the total production of electrical power has doubled than 1980 in Germany.

In 1980, the sum of New zealand electrical power was 127 units, which is increased to 200 units by 2010. The main source of electricity was coal in New zealand in 1980 ( 56 units) which is dramatically surged to 150 units after 20 years. However, natural gas and petroleum consist of 30% in 1980 which plummet to mere 2% in the year of 2010. Moreover, hydro electrical power accounts for 30units and 46 units in 1980 and 2010 respectively.

In Germany, the total electricity generated by given sources were 107 units(1980) and 214 units (2010). The significant growth of electrical power by nuclear energy during the period given. Such as, in 1980 only 20% of current supplied by nuclear which is rapidly increased to 155 units by 2010 among the other sources. Likewise, hydro and nuclear gas were noticeable reduction electricity from 7units and 28 units to mere 2units at the end of the period. Furthermore, coal consist of relatively stable ratio with 28% in both year and petroleum makes up 22% to 27 % by 2010.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-10 eyraen 56 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...over the period given. At once, In 2010, the total production of electrical power...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctricity was coal in New zealand in 1980 56 units which is dramatically surged to...
^^
Line 8, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ively stable ratio with 28% in both year and petroleum makes up 22% to 27 % by 20...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88571428571 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57350464703 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518367346939 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4335992013 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256781152416 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107900385357 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594457504581 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179656453825 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411434920391 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.