Some say that it would be better if the majority of emloyees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday.Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Some say that it would be better if the majority of emloyees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday.

Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages?

Recently, there has been an ongoing argument that working from home has more advantages for both employers and employees. This trend would introduce both pros and cons, but I think that it has more demerits when compared to the merits.

There are a plethora of benefits for both workforces and enterprises. First, the worker will save their time a lot as they do not spend time to commute from home to workplace. That means they could utilize this time for some activities such as household chores; therefore, their lives become more enjoyable. Second, by allowing employees work at home, the employers could cut down the money for office or factory. Indeed, the cost for renting an office in the cosmopolitan place is enormously high, by the way, the director could allocate this money for raising salary for workers.

Apart from some merits I expressed above, I also this trend still has more drawbacks. In terms of working collaboration, this trend impacts detrimentally on the corporation between employees in virtue of not having face-to-face discussion. As a result, the efficiency in works will decrease, and it triggers a loss of money for the company. Moreover, this trend could not apply in some particular workers such as blue-collar workers as they have to go to the factory to manage the production process. If they work at home, how will they observe the machine or operate some process which must be controlled directly? The company, therefore, will confront a lot of risks in lieu of having the conveniences from this trend.

Working at home makes both employers and employees more comfortable; however, I think that it still have more demerits about the way of working and operation.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, apart from, i think, such as, as a result, by the way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02112676056 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72047093546 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542253521127 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5367646865 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20938262264 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802051626084 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627357724974 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147201487249 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322031890274 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.