In some societies, number of crimes committed by teenagers is growing. Some people think that regardless of age, teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adult punishments.
To what extent do you agree?
In many societies, the number of serious crimes committed by adolescents is on the rise, prompting some individuals to advocate for young offenders to be tried and punished as adults, irrespective of their age. However, this essay presents an argument against such an approach, highlighting why it may not effectively address the problem of juvenile delinquency.
To begin with, more severe penalties do not necessarily deter young people from committing offenses. Instead, addressing the root causes of juvenile crime such as low educational attainment, and limited employment opportunities could prove more effective in reducing criminal activity. For instance, in the early 2000s, Norway had one of the highest rates of youth homicide in the country, but the country's leaders recognized that imprisoning young people would not provide a sustainable solution to the problem. As a result, they implemented a comprehensive strategy aimed at tackling the underlying factors contributing to the issue. This included investment in early childhood education, after-school programs, and vocational training opportunities for juveniles. Over time, these measures proved successful.
Moreover, incarcerating minors in adult prisons exposes them to violence and abuse, causing long-lasting psychological consequences. This is particularly concerning for adolescents who are still developing their sense of self. Consider the case of Browder, a teenager from New York City who was arrested at the age of 16 on suspicion of stealing a backpack. Despite maintaining his innocence, he was sentenced to one of the most notorious adult prisons where he was subjected to physical assaults. After his release, he struggled with severe mental health issues caused by traumatic experiences and ultimately committed suicide at the age of 22. This example illustrates the devastating impact that sending minors to adult facilities can have on their mental and emotional well-being.
In conclusion, while it may seem reasonable to treat young offenders who commit serious crimes as adults, a more punitive approach may not always be effective in addressing the underlying causes of juvenile delinquency, as it may not discourage them from committing serious offenses, nor will it rehabilitate them.
- Which of the following technological developments has had the greatest impact on students lives S W A digital books B online classes C smartphones 95
- The bar chart shows the patterns of British families budget distribution on domestic and overseas travel across different age groups in a single year 89
- The pie charts provide information on how money was spent by an American average household in 1970 and in 2004 89
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown what would you change Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 3
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee Recently there have been discussions about ending Grove College s century old tradition of all fema 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...asting psychological consequences. This is particularly concerning for adolescents who are still developin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71260997067 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18501535385 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630498533724 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4216755081 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.866666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172355044283 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475669622287 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545686618107 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996149531758 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269400486186 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.