Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There is an opinion asserting that the most motivating way to have hard-working employees is paying salary based on their performances in selling or producing. However, I completely disagree with the given statement because this way would not be possible or fair in all jobs and circumstances.
To begin with, the workeforces’ performances in some carrier could not be assessed by how much they produce or sell. Take doctors working in hospitals for example; they cure sick visitors and follow their well-being and health condition. These services should be evaluated by other criteria like the sick people’s satisfaction or doctors’ commitment and punctuality. Hence, employees’ salary in should be commensurate with their career jobs.
Another point is that in some situations the concept of equal payment for equal production or sell would be immoral. In other words, some external factors may affect on the rate of production or sell, which are beyond the workers’ control. A good illustration of this would be unexpected extreme weather conditions, which could damage to products of a farm. In such cases paying depended on employees’ output not only is unfair but also discouraging.
Finally, despite the some believes, paying the production or selling staff salaries in proportion to the amount of their achievement would not be the best method to improve individual motivation.That is, in many cases the managers and executive principals would use other encouraging items such as perks and bonuses. In this respect, if such non-financial incentives come with the jobholders, they prompt to work hard.
In conclusion, it is my firm conviction that determining the amount of money employees earn based on how much they produce or sell in order to have hard-working ones is impossible or unfair in many cases. Instead of it there are other motivating items which could be even more efficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e commensurate with their career jobs. Another point is that in some situations...
^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... other words, some external factors may affect on the rate of production or sell, which a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...o discouraging. Finally, despite the some believes, paying the production or sell...
^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...method to improve individual motivation.That is, in many cases the managers and exec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in many cases, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32894736842 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04564053141 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575657894737 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8931928432 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284177627816 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952734342597 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751345389968 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162724765381 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569223831306 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.