Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe this is the a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion
People's lifespan will soon be extended up to a century or even more by the advancement of science. While there are different views about whether this is a favorable thing or not, in my opinion, I consider that detrimental because of its adverse effects on the countries' environment and economy.
On the one hand, some think that living for a more extended period could be a good thing. To begin with, being beside loved ones for over 100 years would make people feel more prosperity and happiness. It may be highlighted when they face the sorrow of their relatives' and friends' death later. Furthermore, if people's life became lengthened, they would have a more productive life. That is, they would have more time to accomplish their goals and expectations, especially those which would be inaccessible in their natural lifetime.
On the other hand, it is argued by some that prolonging human life would be problematic, and I agree. They believe that the fewer deaths, the more population explosion, which leads to more consumption of the limited environmental resources. As a result, this could cause some severe water and food shortage problems, which may cause some strifes and wars worldwide. In addition, dealing with potential physical and mental issues of aging may put societies under financial pressures. To be more precise, the individuals and the governments should spend more money on senior citizens' care and treatment.
In conclusion, although people may vary in their opinion, I think it is not a welcome thing that people live up to 100 years or even more with the help of science. It leads to overpopulation resulting in depletion of world supplies and increases the cost of caring for the elderly for societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...l because of its adverse effects on the countries environment and economy. On the one ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ments should spend more money on senior citizens care and treatment. In conclusion, a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, then, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78761279736 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586805555556 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9986394249 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200907874064 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694431704049 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741750689754 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137513676459 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616788168294 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.