Some people think that the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
After the industrial revolution, people seem to advocate paying a salary that accounts for the employee’s productivity and ability to sell products as an incentive to promote their labor efficiency. However, I personally disagree with this pointview because I believe that social development and ethical values cannot be measured by qualities of work.
Although salaries based on the abilities to produce and sell are likely to increase the possibility of yield and limite lazybones cheating in their work, there are various kinds of professionals requiring more specially moral qualities, particularly such as pedagogy, physicals, sevice. For example, if a lecturer attempts to teach lessons or classes as much as possible to earn more money instead of focusing on how much knowledge their students get, education will soon be ruined. Or if a salesman tends to chase the number and forget their customers after some successful contracts, their guests will no longer be interested in their products and service, leading to decline in their company’s profits. Obviously, payment for those occupations cannot be based on how much the employees are able to make or gain.
Furthermore, there is no denying that social progress will be associated with worthy cores such as civilization, specialization, and creativity rather than chasing the races of boring numbers in work. The socio-economic development needs breakthroughs and dedication of each individual, but if they are paid a small amount of income enough to tightly afford for their life, who can be willing to devote their life for those? It is widely known that it will take many years for an innovation or invention that can change the world to appear. Geniuses or scientists may have difficulty surviving and conducting their trials or experiments without grants when no one wants to pay for the future and only concentrate on what they could do at the present. Thus, this phenomena will cause damaging effects both on motivation of inventors and development in later life.
In conclusion, I do not totally support that people should pay for employees related to what they could do. The employers should take care not only about qualities but also promises in the future and required qualities of each job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 11 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Lunar Tran | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight This is a serious problem for wealthy countries Discuss some causes and effects of this problem 47
- The majority of news is bad news such as wars famines accidents and crimes Why do you think that is Do you think the news should be a balance of both good and bad news 84
- The maps show the changes of the road access to a hospital between 2007 and 2010 Describe the main features of the maps 73
- In many countries the amount of crime is increasing What do you think are the main causes of crime How can we deal with those causes Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language in primary schools rather than in secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...hat they could do at the present. Thus, this phenomena will cause damaging effects b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2301369863 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8974128008 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605479452055 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3567237461 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.846153846 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0769230769 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170421852667 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625216363838 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522162533675 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108927609003 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249610801276 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.