Some think that the investment should be made in the development of new transportation infrastructure between towns. Others claim that the investment should be made in the improvement of current transportation systems in the cities.
The opinions vary on whether the investment should be made on the development of new transportation infrastructure between towns or on the improvemet of current transportation systems in the cities. In my opinion, it is preferable to allocate money in the new railways in order to increase economic activity via the citizen’s mobility growth.
The argument against this is that existing public transport has its amortization time and should have been constanly improved once in a certain period to in order to keep it availabile. Thus, in countries with a remarkable public transport infrastructure, such as Sweden or Finland, a significant part of a budget is spent on the improvement of current conditions.
However, investing money into a construction of new railways lines can increase the proportion of people who have access to the transport, which lead to uplift of people’s mobility and the increase the economic activity. This argument is more useful for countries with wide territories where there is an obvious necessity in such investment projects. A good example would be Russia or US, where the huge territories should be covered with railway lines in order to ensure the basic economic activity.
By the same token, the implemention of new projects in terms of construction suppose the usage of new technologies that will allow people not only to get access to another cities, but also to travel fast.
In conclusion, although the maintainance of current public transport system is worth investing, the new construction of railways is more vital, especially for countries with largly spread territories.
Votes
- The maps show the development of the seaside resort of Templeton over the span of 15 years from 1990 to 2005 67
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process of bricks Describe the process
- Teachers affect students more than other students 76
- Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32046332046 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14730790124 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559845559846 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.5689192845 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 153.111111111 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7777777778 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328016676282 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138733130751 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170433160609 0.0667982634062 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170334210778 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129051501976 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.