Some think that it is more important for children to engage in outdoor activities instead of playing videogames
The segment of the population claims that children are supposed to prioritize participating in outdoor activities over playing video games. In my point of view, though there are legitimate reasons to support this idea, the latter diversion is indisputably more educational in recent years.
Many who advocate the outdoors activities point out that the benefits of such activities listed down are greater in general. Firstly, it is worth bearing in mind that, obesity is one of the crucial concerns which are being dealt with today. This is due to the fact that the majority have been suffering from sedentary life also they strive to promote a healthy lifestyle through such activities. Additionally, this is an actual benefit in terms of being more vivacious when children engage in social activity. If the youngsters do play outdoor games, which pragmatically cultivate teamwork, they safeguard their bright future and validate their effort from their upbringing.
Nevertheless, online games play a key role in this era, they become more instructive at any point in the past. For example, some types of games such as puzzle and matching features that learn significant marks on a player’s mind. On the other hand, if children deprived of such games, they would not improve the problem-solving skills and cognitive abilities. Consequently, such modern educational games contribute greatly to children’s quality of life in order to shape their minds.
In conclusion, despite the benefits of outdoor activities which are served for children, such as owning a healthy lifestyle and fostering children teamwork. In my view, a complete ban of online games is indispensable as the educational implication of using such games is convincing enough to open up the side of their brain which improves children’s technical skills in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-07 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-14 | sharanbhullar | 68 | view |
| 2021-09-14 | sharanbhullar | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-14 | sharanbhullar | 61 | view |
- Some think that it is more important for children to engage in outdoor activities instead of playing videogames 84
- Men do most of the high level jobs Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women What is your opinion on that 73
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of two dinners Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 11
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 78
- Some think that climate change reforms will negatively affect business Others feel they are an opportunity for businesses 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, for example, in conclusion, in general, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36643835616 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94398469443 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7582141106 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2218855006 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793008411477 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649899686524 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137608553759 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147738275523 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.