It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
These days children have been encouraged to get to know working in farmlands, especially rural areas. I opine that however, there is a compelling reason to support this idea, the disadvantages of such situations should also be taken into consideration.
The majority who advocate the idea of learning farming-skills point out that such abilities are named as basic requirements of each person. As a matter of fact, each individual needs to be taught how to survive under any circumstances without the other’s assistance. For example, the European children have been provided with the full breadth of opportunities to attend in some workshops to be educated the crucial needs of the human to have a sustainable life in the future. Consequently, with regard to the actual benefits of these skills, it is reported to have been taught in most developed countries recently.
Nevertheless, there are some significant drawbacks which are advised to be discussed, one of which is that the effect of technology in today’s life makes these educations useless. To some extent, with the advancement of technology, most of the rural activities have been done by robots so such skills are not observed as a fundamental requirement for children, therefore, the efficient strategy for the youngsters can be listed down as learning the newest technological gadgets. In more detail, children have not spent too much time and energy on learning some monotonous tasks done by computers. In contrast, if children strive hard to be educated in modern issues, they are capable of improving the quality of life for the next generation.
To sum up, despite the benefits of learning the basic requirement of life for humanity, there are some disadvantages that need to be addressed. In my point of view, modern topics are supposed to be mentioned in children's courses as they play a critical role in fostering prosperity in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-25 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | yufdtrdfyt | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of two dinners Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 11
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case do you think it is a positive or negative situation 87
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 78
- Men do most of the high level jobs Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women What is your opinion on that 73
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, as a matter of fact, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16720257235 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04644011018 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56270096463 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8213474995 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993465361477 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397786810894 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241811471995 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673386380028 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133490332783 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.