Some TV programmes, video of violent games and other leisure activities are harmful on children.
How harmful they are? What can be done to solve these problem?
Experts throughout both the developing and developed world have debated the issue of the increasing violent content in video games, TV shows or other activities. Parents should take precaution measures to mitigate the negative consequences of this problem. This essay will discuss this issue and how to deal with it appropriately, using examples from BBC news and Queensland University to demonstrate points and prove arguments.
To begin with, the majority of information and content on TV, video games and extra activities are designed to target vulnerable children. This can bring some detrimental side effects on the children's cognitive skills such as the capacity of learning vocabulary and knowledge at an early age. For example, recent empirical research by Queensland University suggested that 20% of children in the modern society have full access to violence, pornography through TV or the Internet and as a result they show poor performance academic at school. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that parents should fully aware of their children's activities at home in order to enhance their children development.
To tackle the above problem, parents should impose certain restrictions on accessing contents and knowledge from TV, video games or the Internet to protect their children. Avoiding TV programmes and movies or blocking access to disrespectful websites can help to reduce the negative consequences. For example, an article published by BBC news showed most young parents are adopting proactive measures to several technological devices at home such as TV or computer. Conclusively, it is possible to state beyond doubt that several restrictions should be taken into account in terms of guaranteeing control access to different devices at home.
To conclude from the arguments and examples given parents should always be vigilant and embrace a protective behaviour towards their children, otherwise, children’ academic performance will be harmed. Restrictions on different tech devices, including TV and computers at home should be effectively embraced by children. In the future, there will be more challenges to overcome in terms of children development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-10 | renzotello99 | 84 | view |
- Some TV programmes video of violent games and other leisure activities are harmful on children How harmful they are What can be done to solve these problem 84
- Local governments are pushing companies to move from large cities to regional locations What are the benefits and drawbacks of this Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Nowadays it is common for people to get married and have children in their thirties rather than when they are younger Do you agree or disagree that this trend will benefit society 73
- Some people believe that longer prison sentences are the best way to decrease crime while others believe that there are alternative ways to decrease crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overcoming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: overcoming
...e future, there will be more challenges to overcome in terms of children development.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59036144578 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0297432039 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1309082369 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.571428571 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215083387796 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773088137255 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409532889239 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127155101961 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283213559789 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.