Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development?
Recently, due to the evolution of technology, more schools all around the world provide students with online classes. This phenomenon has both pros and cons. However, I strongly concur that the benefits are dominant.
On the one hand, the main drawback of virtual education is that students may lack the opportunity to socialize. When it comes to online learning, people might not have a chance to engage face-to-face with their teacher and will instead have to interact by chatting. Moreover, it is not easy for learners to compare their performance with their peers when they study on the Internet which can affect the grade of some people. For instance, in a traditional classroom, there is a healthy environment for students to come into direct contact with each other. This component is missing in the virtual classroom due to the fact that online learners are restricted to communicate through website forum areas.
Despite the downsides mentioned above, I believe that online education is a boon for students because of various reasons. First and foremost, it is clear that remote teaching allows learners to study in a flexible way which means that they can work whenever and wherever is convenient. Secondly, nontraditional pupils are authorized to study at their own pace. For example, if there is a lecture that they find difficult, they can revise it as many times as they want by rewinding the video of the professor teaching until you understand fully. This is not possible in the case of regular classroom learning. Moreover, due to studying on the Internet, the cost can be reduced greatly. Finally, online learning offers open access to anybody who has an inclination to study, regardless of age, location or background.
In conclusion, while virtual learning may have some dermirit, I consider it to be a helpful innovation overall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-08 | thanhtu000 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The line graph compares USA Canada and Mexico in terms of the proportion of people using internet from 1999 to 2009 89
- internet users as percentages of population 78
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a flexible way" with adverb for "flexible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...emote teaching allows learners to study in a flexible way which means that they can work whenever...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7709164259 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8579857555 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208585557245 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605585720375 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506535110796 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102778534799 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578209700551 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.