Space exploration
Since its beginnings, humankind would look up to the stars and wonder about their nature. No surprise then that exploring the universe fascinates many, while some believe this venture, even though exciting, is not worth its costs. I agree with the latter one, as for now, the space travel should stay the subject of science movies and mankind ought to concentrate on resolving current issues on the Earth.
On the one side, supporters of space exploration believe that cosmos might hold a solution to the issues of overpopulation and impending environmental cataclysm. They argue that only finding another habitable planet can save mankind. There is also a hypothesis that another intelligent species, existing in the universe, might hold answers to philosophical and religious questions. Moreover, there has also been an ongoing race, which was started over 60 years ago, between certain nations, mostly the USA, Russia, China to dominate the space and claim it for themselves. In this context, it is a matter of national pride.
On the other side, many people argue that humankind does not benefit from space exploration and there are more urgent issues that require our attention and resources. Our own planet, its exploration and protection should be priority and funds must be diverted to tackling environmental and human rights issues. Moreover, those voices often rise a question of safety of attempts to contact extraterrestrial beings, saying they might be a hazard to our safety on the planet Earth. As many as 70% of people in the UK believe that aliens would pose a threat to mankind.
Finally, in my opinion, searching for a habitable planet outside our solar system, should stay a subject of science-fiction movies. At least until mankind can resolve issues of our survival on the planet Earth, all resources should be directed to creating a healthy and safe environment for our children to grow up in and to preserve the world that live in. Alarmingly, scientists at the Convention of Biological Diversity concluded that as many as 150 species extinct every day.
In conclusion, even though there has always been and always will be excitement about exploring the universe, it is better to concentrate on problems we face immediately on the Earth. Although some argue that only discovering a new habitable planet can guarantee survival of mankind, I agree with an opinion that the resources should be put in preserving the planet for future generations, as the chance of actually relocating to another solar system, is a faint hope.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-14 | Sandeep USA | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Manideep Macherla | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- Nowadays we re producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can the government do to help reduce amount of rubbish 78
- GOVERNMENT SHOULD FUND SCIENTIFIC RATHER THAN COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATION TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE STATEMENT 56
- Science and technology are more important than history 78
- Some people think that international news is more important than local news Others argue that local news is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some people believe that we should invent a new language for international communication To what extent do you agree disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...ts exploration and protection should be priority and funds must be diverted to tackling ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... many as 150 species extinct every day. In conclusion, even though there has alw...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, look, moreover, so, then, while, as for, at least, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12709832134 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81524150156 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544364508393 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7051680183 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.764705882 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182921037533 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572089379889 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835030102102 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106429497608 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677733228471 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.