Space research is a waste of money. The government should spend money on improving conditions of people living on the Earth. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Space research has been developed with great strides due to massive financial investment from the state, and it benefits people’s lives in various aspects. However, some people argue that government should cut down the budget of the research and spend this money on improving people’s living conditions. In my opinion, although it is vital to support people in under-developed areas, government should not stop exploring the space.
On the one hand, the astronomic research has not been done without reasons, and the results from massive studies about the universe have dramatically changed human’s lives. Those achievements improved people’s life in regard of transportation and entertainment. For example, the application of numerous manmade satellites has resulted in the development of the Global Positioning System (GPS), which assists travelers to locate their positions accurately and select better routines. Moreover, people in many countries can watch television channels globally because of the development of satellites as well. Therefore, the achievement of space research indeed has changed humans’ lives incredibly.
On the other hand, some people argue that spending money enhancing people’s conditions is worthier than supporting space research. They believe that financial assistance from the government can benefit individuals who are living in poverty by helping them reconstruct houses, obtain healthier food and purchase medicine. However, it is unjustified to say that space research is a waste of money simply based on this ground. The reason is that space research has the potential to produce productive outcomes for humans. To explain, the main driving force for many outer space projects is to explore new energy as well as possible dwelling places for our future existence. Therefore, space research should not be excluded from national plans.
In conclusion, although developing people’s living conditions is an important issue to be concerned, government should not ignore the achievement and benefits from space research.
- Space research is a waste of money The government should spend money on improving conditions of people living on the Earth To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Some people think the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, think there are better ways to reduce crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 747, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld not be excluded from national plans. In conclusion, although developing peopl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83061889251 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05743664052 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586319218241 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4694532826 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320977513968 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11978176751 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939256694095 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219011602473 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856272684607 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.