In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem

Many people are expressing their concern about hunger, despite the agricultural improvement. In fact, this is one of the most severe problems drawing plenty of attention of not just individuals but also authorities in many nations. Nonetheless, a central question remains regarding what the principal causes and solutions to this issue. This essay will present a few main causes and suggest several feasible solutions.

In the light of the fact that this matter may result from a variety of factors. One of them is population explosion. To be more specific, burgeoning population means that the need for food of each individual witnesses a rapid growth. This phenomenon leads to nourishment overload, which has put an enormous pressure on today’s farmers. So that they can not supply enough and timely for all local inhabitants, which result in starvation. Another reason can be there is plenty of indigent residents who are unaffordable for sustenance. This trend transpire especially in developing country with low quality of national economy. As can be seen from statistic in State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World, high costs and deficient food credit-worthiness mean that billions of people don't have healthy or nutritious meals. Moreover, pandemics such as Covid-19, smallpox, cholera, etc also contribute to the hunger. This cause is easily understandable because no matter how excellent our agriculture are, human does not enable to domination the nature. Therefore, when an infectious disease turns up accidentally, it exacerbates weaknesses and shortcomings in the global food system, which is understood to mean all activities and processes that affect the production, distribution and consumption of food and bring about serious famine.

So as to handle this problem, a plenty of measures must be carried out. As for the government, they should encourage each local agriculture to mass-produce as much as possible to qualify the demand for food of dwellers. Additionally, agricultural tax also had better be reduced to decrease the rations, which makes it feasible for anyone to buy food. In term of the individuals, each citizen need to economize on provision to prevent from being lack of adequate nourishment when several unexpected events happen such as pandemic, economic crisis, etc. Furthermore, social activists should establish more reliable charity fund to support nutriment for penniless people.

In conclusion, for what have been mentioned above, it can be affirmed that although our agriculture has been innovated, a great deal of people still suffer from malnutrition. The root why it has not been ameliorated lies in overpopulation, the shortage of food, pandemic, etc. Thus, it is highly recommended that not only authorities but also inhabitants need to have a part in tackling this issue.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 788, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...worthiness mean that billions of people dont have healthy or nutritious meals. Moreo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: To
...food and bring about serious famine. So as to handle this problem, a plenty of measur...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, well, as for, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2399.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 444.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40315315315 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07330940578 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 176.041082164 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4189949676 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.304347826 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3043478261 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.39130434783 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243290111822 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644685774974 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471935600834 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15317936355 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453085306822 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.