The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Presented are the two maps exhibiting the transformation in the layout of Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010.
As transparent from the maps, this city has become much more modern and dynamic.
One remarkable modification can be seen is the highways at the city centre was converted into the lane for only pedestrian can use. This adjustment is mainly due to the fact that citizen has been paying more attention about environment and they prefer to utilize public transport. Moreover, also for that reason, another station was constructed in the vacant land, which was opposite the old one. Another striking change is a bunch of trees in the northwest of the first map was cut down to make way for new apartment blocks. This variation is easily understandable because the population has been growing ceaselessly day by day and building a new flat like that is a feasible solution to this phenomenon. In 2010, the authority constructed a brand new shopping centre in order to supersede the old factory as a way to boost the income of Shipsmouth economy.
Additionally, it is noticeable that the lot near the shopping centre, which used to be unoccupied was made into a football stadium to satisfy the passion about sport of local inhabitants. Going further to the northeast of this region, the place used to locate a church was knocked down and turn into a pub. Moreover, the two private building witnessed the demolition to built skyscrapers as a result of urbanisation. In term of the treeline in the southeast, in 2010, an airport is under construction. This was a modification in order to advance the smoothly exchanges to other districts which is outside the Shipsmouth.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93971631206 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93132029984 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570921985816 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9752716795 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.153846154 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0828404318556 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327562635829 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501387436107 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668405068709 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705624785794 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.