In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
It is true that great progress has been made in agriculture, such as enhancing the amount of yields in each field, but as is reported by the media, there are still numerous people who don't have enough food to eat. From my perspective, three reasons can account for this problem.
Firstly, food is difficult to transport in romote villages. With few roads, local residents cannot purchase food from the city and instead they can only eat what they plant. As is known to us all, little vegetables can grow in winter when the temperature is below zero. Thus, people have to store food in autumn, but for some places, winter can be quite long and the only way to solve this problem is to eat less and as a result they easily feel hungry. Secondly, with the population growing rapidly, especially in India, the total amount of food can not satisfy all the people. Naturally, lots of people cannot be provided with enough food. What's more, the disasters may cause this phenomenon. For example, the severe flood might hamper the germination of seeds in spring, giving rise to the death of those plants.
In order to address this problem, there are also three solutions. To begin with, more roads should be built by the government for the sake of connecting those villages with cities. WIth easy access to the town, I believe more people will purchase enough food to go through the winter. Besides, the fields for rice and wheat are supposed to be enlarged to bring more food. Less construction on the countryside enables farmers to expand their fields to gain food. Last but not least, new technology should be implemented and biologists need to create new species which can offer more quantities of food and are able to survive after droughts and storms.
All in all, the reasons why so many people go hungry are listed, and the solutions to this problem are mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin27 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | Iruki | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | aria etemadi | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | JiaYanLi | 73 | view |
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 75
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry 11
- The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- All parents should be required to volunteer their time to their children's schools. 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ia, there are still numerous people who dont have enough food to eat. From my perspe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...le cannot be provided with enough food. Whats more, the disasters may cause this phen...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74617737003 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37043500545 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590214067278 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1828021137 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2941176471 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233427646512 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744076035887 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648623630775 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161402952348 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438745811174 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.