In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem?

Essay topics:

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

The last decades have witnessed ever-growing concerns on the worldwide famine despite of agricultural advancement. Various individuals contend that the main culprit of hunger is climate change whereas certain socialists asserted that poverty is the major source of the predicament. In this sense, it is worth ascertaining this rather polemical issue thoroughly and discussing ways of overcoming this pressing issue.

First and foremost, it is widely acknowledged that the worrisome famine in various areas over the world is the implication of climate change in recent years. The increasingly frequent and disastrous natural disasters, including drought, tsunami and earthquakes, have taken away asset of countless number of residents worldwide. Resultantly, areas of crops, in addition to damaged infrastructure and transportation, were destroyed in a large scale. Hence, crop failure increases the likelihood to malnutrition and infectious disease. As asserted by certain socialists, poverty is the major cause of famine, notably when various individuals are unable to withstand inflation. Unquestionably, capital in various developing countries is insufficient to import food from other areas in the world, and therefore the residents suffer from life threatening starvation.

As large-scale famine is known to be life threatening, related authorities ought to make incessant efforts to mitigate the detrimental scenario.

Undoubtedly, the government plays a pivotally vital role to help the impoverished residents to survive. Pragmatic measures such as supplying seeds and tools that farmers can grow own food are constructive measures. Distributing cash and providing emergency food when necessary and working with a network of local partners to help farmers are other alternatives.

Viewed as a whole, it is axiomatic that urgent and immediate measures ought to be taken to ameliorate the situation. Yet, certain attention ought to be placed on advocating the associated authorities for increased investment on saving the life of residents. Indeed, far-reaching measures are able to assist the adaptation for the new skills and concepts in the foreseeable future.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 aghasaeed 78 view
2020-01-27 geforce 61 view
2020-01-25 Noah1997 78 view
2020-01-08 yasinyucesan 95 view
2020-01-02 choco_fans 11 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87421383648 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24730112523 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606918238994 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1335960738 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.75 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.076149375825 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207874471729 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390872583387 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0390541365775 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030564241228 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.