Globalization has opened doors for giant corporations to enter regional markets all over the globe. I agree that such initiative positively transformed the market practice both from sellers’ perspective as well as buyers’ perspective.
The local sellers, much debated to be the most affected party due to globalization, received the opportunity to take a step further from their current position. As the multinational companies enter with their high-quality products at an attractive price, these sellers are forced to comply with similar quality and they have to re-engineer the designs to offer acceptable market price. This action not only makes the domestic sellers potent to local market, but also opens global market for trading. In recent years, It is observed that several local companies transformed their operations and became international conglomerate by serving global market.
In terms of the buyers, who are the key to any market, they received a competitive market, where they have very strong bargain power over the sellers. Such market offers the customers a wide range of products and the price is very competitive. As a consequence, the consumers can compare the offerings, analyze the price, check the quality and then they can decide which one to pick. Nokia, for instant, used to be a tech-giant in global market, but customers switched to other products, making Nakia financially vulnerable over time. Apparently, a perfectly competitive market allows the buyers effective bargain power.
To conclude, globalization affected both the buyers and sellers all over the world. But, the most important change that this model initiated, is making the products as well as the sellers global.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...practice both from sellers’ perspective as well as buyers’ perspective. The local selle...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng. In recent years, It is observed that several local companies transformed thei...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44943820225 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90957003319 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7655489354 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.923076923 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849546499713 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340959163434 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026142349182 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589294514782 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209710262984 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.