The spread of multinational companies and the resulting increase of globalization produce positive effects to everyone Do you agree or disagree

Globalisation opened a new world of opportunities to both national and international companies as well many developed and developing nations. Everyone considering this as a new step towards a completely different world. When the term globalization coined at the first time, it attracted lot of criticism from around the world, especially from economists. But slowly it's been accepted widely. However, some people believe that it produce positive effects to everyone. I agree to this statement to a certain extent.

To begin with, globalization has many advantages. It is very helpful for the economic development of not so developed countries. When multinational companies start their business in such regimes, there will be lot of employment opportunities and also results in infrastructure development of that area. Moreover, local companies also get some benefits from this by way of supplying the raw materials to these companies they can find a global market for their products. On top of that, state gets huge amount of money as taxes and legal fees from these companies.

On the flip side of the coin it has some negative effects too. First of all international companies don't give much importance to the environmental effects that they are causing in the host countries. In addition, increased competition from the multinational companies may affect the local industries, some times it might result in close down of some decades old local businesses. Furthermore, these so called companies are very powerful in terms of finance and influence, this might result in controlling the entire resources of a country. That eventually creates monopoly and unfair trade practices.

To recapitulate, Globalisation provides lot of good effects if we think in wider terms, but we can not generalize this effects as positive to everyone. Just like every system it also has some negative effects. So the governments should keep an eye on everything when they open their economy to world market.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o. First of all international companies dont give much importance to the environment...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, in addition, first of all, to begin with, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32278481013 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09366803746 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591772151899 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0311972844 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5263157895 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207348932718 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541473785855 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474644068204 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115918525212 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326573100488 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.