Students in school or university learn more from teachers than from other resources (e.g. Internet or TV), do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that schools or universities are the better places to support students’ learning outcomes than through other resources such as computers or TV. Although schools can promote students’ academic performance, I am more convinced that other reasons also play an important role in supporting students’ development.
It is true that students learn most academic knowledge including literacy, maths, science and history from schools or higher education from an early age. Teachers deliver useful and effective information through pedagogical approaches and quality curriculum to make sure that students acquire the necessary knowledge to enhance their academic achievements. Therefore, students indeed learn numerous theories and knowledge from teachers.
However, only mastering these academic knowledge does not make a student become a well-rounded person. There are certain areas that schools or tertiary education may not focus on. Internet and TV programmes can just serve as a supplementary tool to strengthen these areas. For example, quality educational TV programmes such as BBC Animals offer younger students a great opportunity to understand the world in an in-depth level, allowing them to have a better connection with the community that schools do not offer. In addition, some students prefer to browse further background information on those particular subjects out of their academic curriculum. For these reasons, other resources can become a practical educational instrument to enhance students’ learning.
In conclusion, this essay argued that despite schools’ advantage in teaching student useful academic information, other resources like computers or TV are also essential in students’ life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | mandy.zang | 61 | view |
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every aspect. Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Students in school or university learn more from teachers than from other resources (e.g. Internet or TV), do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. Why is it? Is it a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also essential in students' life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03585657371 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15654029076 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629482071713 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4587213211 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325834100608 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115315961681 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737142637189 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192733443839 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447459733876 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.