Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree/disagree?
Currently, it has said that it would better teach children about academic knowledge to pass exams rather than allowing them to learn about cooking and dressing. In my opinion, I totally disagree this idea for a number of reasons below.
On the one hand, studying academic knowledge enable students to get good marks in exams and also have some advantages in the future. Obviously, academic knowledge tends to be required to get through exams instead of soft skills. For example, to cope with a mathematic exam, they should learn by heart an enormous number of equations which take them a huge amount of time. Perhaps this is the reason why they should not have enough time for other activities. However, if they are well-trained by teachers and study hard enough, they would achieve impressive academic performance and get some certificates which help them climb off the ladder of success afterward. Therefore, treaching academic knowlegde for children is worthwhile and beneficial. Despite the fact that academic knowledge would only help them at school and ensure a well-paid profession, it cannot make their life easy or meet fundamental demands.
In terms of soft skills like cooking, dressing, these things may make your life easier to live and more active. These abilities would be necessary for survival. For example, in western countries, teenagers tend to separate from their parents earlier, move away and live alone. In this situation, it requires them to know simply how to cook a meal or wash their clothing etc. ; however, academic knowledge cannot help. On top of that, students need to be taught about communicating skills which are valuable in establishing a new relationship and making new friends easier. It would play an essential role in their future career and keeping away some mental conditions like depression.
To recapitulate, students not only study academic knowledge but also master soft skills to survive and succeed in their lifetime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | Heera Gill | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Anand9526 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | Szprawstyle | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | chipchip96 | 84 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree/disagree? 84
- The table below shows the average weekly salaries of men and od women working in different occupations.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day Summerise the information bu selecting and reporting the main features make some comparisons where relevant 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in my opinion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17868338558 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67158075865 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601880877743 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6725578304 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1764705882 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20289319003 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629560229513 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402799234646 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117556503386 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217436558917 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.