successful professional athletes can earn much more than people in other professions such as nurses doctors and teachers. some people think it is completely neutral while others think it is unfair. do you agree or disgree.
Some great sportspeople's earnings are much higher than some medical professionals and teachers. However, some people believe that it is not good to have such an excellent wage difference among professionals while others think it would be equal. The income of athletes is not related to a particular system, in turn, it would be managed mostly by the sponsors, therefore it is difficult to be neutral.
On the one hand, people who argued about salary would be neutral and claim that everyone is working equally in one or another ways. Therefore discrimination of salary would lead to conflict and controversy among professionals. Similarly, health workers and teachers often face many difficulties in the working environment so discrimination in wages would not be fair. For instance, medical staff are playing with the life of people and their work is more important than athletes. Likewise, teachers are the stepping stone of every individual thereby work of academic professionals is also extremely important.
On the other hand, successful athletes are often under the management of sponsors or multinational groups. Earnings of such professionals are varying with each other even with every sponsor. Owing to the fact that, no one can make judiciary over their income and their wages would differentiate every year according to their performance level. Whereas other professionals' income would be stable and the increment also affects every worker equally to the core. Moreover, every athletic person must manage their health and fitness every day and their practice, sports festivals are not similar to other working employee's workplaces. Great athletes are often needs to go international level and their lifestyle, family situations also have wide range of difference than other mentioned professionals.
To sum up, every profession has its own characteristics, therefore income levels would not consider to be the same.
- Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- the chart below show the film participation in Australia and also shows the typical film trips of different age groups from 1996 to 2000 take a look at the data and select and announce key highlights 68
- the chart below shows the temperature and rainfall in equatorial and mediteranien climates 67
- some people think that in this todays world getting older is entirely bad however other people believe that the lives of older people are much better now than they were in the past discus both views and express your own opinion 73
- the diagram below shows spending on five unique items for children 18 and multi year 2010 2014
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...working equally in one or another ways. Therefore discrimination of salary would lead to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professionals'' or 'professional's'?
Suggestion: professionals'; professional's
... their performance level. Whereas other professionals income would be stable and the incremen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46333333333 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99939808777 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556666666667 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3834965251 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.266666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231770345096 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822518303661 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658183967658 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133044716746 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882066893773 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...working equally in one or another ways. Therefore discrimination of salary would lead to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professionals'' or 'professional's'?
Suggestion: professionals'; professional's
... their performance level. Whereas other professionals income would be stable and the incremen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46333333333 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99939808777 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556666666667 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3834965251 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.266666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231770345096 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822518303661 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658183967658 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133044716746 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882066893773 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.