Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas.
What are your opinions on this
The social phenomenon of food consumption has been drawing public attention. The question of whether supermarkets should alone sell goods manufactured from within their country or importing foods from other countries not is a controversial issue. I totally disagree with this point of view and this essay will show the following reasons.
There are several reasons to explain why food consumption in a country without importing that takes its toll on many aspects of a country. If the number of supermarkets does not commence a necessary innovation about ingredients, foods and among others; all residents will become bored with full of being out of date products. This means that this leads to a dire consequence which all citizens gradually steer clear of these products. Furthermore, the profit of the supermarkets would be declined considerably in the sense that the income of the staff also could be excessively low, which throws their quality of life in disarray.
On the contrary, many hold a belief that imported food could reap an array of benefits. First and Foremost, this also presents many perfect opportunities to enhance the quality of food. To be more specific, the promotion of creativity about food could be developed strongly, which makes the competitions between many supermarkets become cutthroat with the sole objective to revenue the income. As a result, they have to update the condition of food better to cater to people with a lot of selections in purchasing food. Secondly, it is when many imported foods are widespread which is the culprit of widening chances to address the rate of unemployment for any governments. The end results could support governments to minimize crippling pressures about the responsibility for being out of work by the welfare state, which is stretched thin from year to year.
For the reasons mentioned above, the assets of imported foods will be far more significant than availing self-produced foods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-13 | Rudraksha surve | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | gladz0917 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | kkcmunna | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-21 | sudheerssmg | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | shiffali Garg | 73 | view |
- News is playing a vital role in our life today and people are getting much influenced by the news now Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news program 78
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 08 2019 89
- In some countries the quality of life in larger cities is declining Why do you think this is happening What measures can be taken to stop it 73
- It is often said that to become a successful businessman a tertiary education is not all necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion with relevant examples 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...tion has been drawing public attention. The question of whether supermarkets should alone sell goods ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...f life in disarray. On the contrary, many hold a belief that imported food could reap ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23101265823 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9143817207 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5702900135 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.071428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258336260474 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875511424039 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931311528081 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172556699383 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974574714529 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.