Longer lifespan’s effects have been a matter of contention. Some people hold firm to the belief that there is an increasing number of old citizens and this is associated with the whole society in general and affect to others age individuals in particular. Such effects require further deliberation.
First and foremost, the lack of human resources is prioritized for discussion. It is widely acknowledged that it is hard for elders to the workforce because they usually have to suffer from physical problems and mental abilities. Although there are many given solutions such as expanded the working-age, it still disadvantages the laboring quality a lot. Furthermore, this also creates opportunities for foreigners to immigrate to other regions and the natives may be overwhelmed in their own countryside.
In the second place, the financial burden is worth contemplating. It is common knowledge that the major income of the senior citizens is the pension which is provided by the government. People living longer means that government has to pay more for expenditure incurred and as a result, public financial resources constantly short. As a case in point, they always receive precedence from society such as supports for hospital fees or modern technologies in nursing homes in developed countries.
Last but not least, making advantages from elderly is of paramount importance. It cannot be denied that the longer people live, the more services available for the elderly, and older people are easily seduced so they can be used to make a profit. For instance, in Vietnameses, there were hundreds of news that exposed the tricks to scam money from elders of the evildoer.
All in all, it is considered that the aging population causes some negative effects not only on individuals but also on the whole society. From my perspective, I hold the belief that the consequences of this problem are associated with the context of the entire society. The government ought to thoroughly consider the aforementioned notion to make the right decision.
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 95
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 61
- The diagram illustrates how steel rods are manufactured in the furniture industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries But increased life expectancy has many implications for aging individuals and for society as a whole What are the possible effects of longer living for individuals and society 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... effects require further deliberation. First and foremost, the lack of human re...
^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e overwhelmed in their own countryside. In the second place, the financial burde...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nursing homes in developed countries. Last but not least, making advantages fr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, still, as to, for instance, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, on the whole, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26443768997 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98859477169 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58358662614 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3993965488 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.882352941 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298489888985 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712940517426 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596470127222 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142053807372 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428508052349 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.