In today’s world, technology plays a crucial role in every facet of a person’s life. Artificial intelligence machines have altered how people interact with one another. The relationships people make have been impacted by how convenient it is to communicate and how easy it is to take care of family and friends in daily life as well as with colleagues in the workplace. The essay will analyze these effects before presenting the final conclusion.
Firstly, the advent of technology helps people connect with people around them easily and faster, despite physical distance. For example, my brother, Felix, who had studied abroad in Korea for 5 years, still kept in contact with me and my parents by texting and video calling through Facebook and Messenger at the tip of his finger. This helped us constantly update about Felix’s health and amazing things about his life so that my mother and my father could feel secure. It can be seen that people can maintain their relationships by contacting others more often using smart devices connected to wifi. Thus, technological invention brings an easy way for humans to interact with each other in the relationships they make.
Furthermore, the development of all kinds of technology creates a new and convenient way for people to take care of their loved ones. For instance, banking apps like BIDV smart banking and delivery apps like Baemin in Vietnam help people send presents to family, friends, and colleagues on special occasions, in case they cannot meet each other directly. It is clear that people now are able to effortlessly show their love in important relationships due to the support of technological apps. Therefore, the relations have been tightly attached on account of timely care in spite of distance.
After looking at both these effects, I strongly believe that technology has brought a positive change in how people make and keep their relationships in good condition.
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a 84
- the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1320754717 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77860752609 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616352201258 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5336378253 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315547723606 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105082999841 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825801970854 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183247442588 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351232340445 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1320754717 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77860752609 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616352201258 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5336378253 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315547723606 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105082999841 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825801970854 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183247442588 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351232340445 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.