In the present context, the ways people communicate with others has been influenced greatly by the improvement in technology. In my view, this advancement in technology has rendered both positive and negative effects in personal aspects such as relationship.
The ways in which people communicate with others have changed from direct contact to virtual contact; for example, instead of meeting someone in person we meet people in our social applications like facebook, messenger, viber and whats app. It is, in a way, a good approach in maintaining long distance relationships with our families, friends and loved ones. This development in technology has helped us all save our precious time as we can talk to anyone anywhere in the world with just a click in our modern gadgets. We can choose to meet in person or through phone calls or simply email depending upon the circumstances.
Like a coin has its two faces, technology has also its drawbacks. For example, there are many people in the world that open fake accounts and lure innocent people into relationship fraud or con people on emotional grounds. We have heard of pedophiles exploiting children via internet, and there are many crimes committed simply because the other person on the other side of your mobile or communication device sounds genuine, understanding and more in love with you than the real people you are surrounded with. We often tend to live in our virtual world and ignore our real friends and families when it comes to our online acquaintances.
In conclusion, I would like to add there is no harm in embracing the graces of technology in developing new relationships or contacts, or even maintaining our existing contacts. However, we should always be alert about the wrong type of people with hideous intentions who can always sound appealing to us. If we can balance these two facets, we will not ever have to regret technology.
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 73
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ons like facebook, messenger, viber and whats app. It is, in a way, a good approach i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not ever have to regret technology.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0407523511 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85321225236 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601880877743 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9821956889 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.692307692 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268935227481 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091929772758 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073211939892 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171995758497 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541957170361 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.