Task 2: Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
It is incontrovertible that there are conflicting views about the benefits of hosting major international sport events. While there is a widespread belief that the host nation can receive several advantages from such activities, I also agree with the arguments that they may be also prone to numerous detrimental consequences.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that advocates of hosting international sport events can be advantaged in terms of health and economic prosperity. Firstly, a health awareness can be effectively promoted thanks to the public interest in reputable sport events, in which new world records may be set while a fierce competitive spirit is fostered. Moreover, sport coverage on TV programs also fires the imagination of youngsters in host countries, who are likely to be swayed by trending sport activities and emulate their national heroes. From an economical perspective, the influx of sports fans to the host nations also facilitates the development of many industries, especially tourism. For instance, 2014 World Cup has provided several opportunities for the Brazilian government to promote the construction of accommodations and tourist destinations for foreigners, which resultingly enhances the income of local authorities.
On the other hand, I also firmly concur that too much value has been placed on sport. Particularly, such international events are merely potential opportunities for hotels, restaurants, and businesses involving sport merchandising to maximize their profits, while other crucial parts such as education, healthcare service, and human welfare are fallen by the wayside. In other words, allocating resources to these activities means more indigent residents have to shoulder an ever-growing financial burden regarding accommodation and feedstocks themselves.
In conclusion, although hosting an international sport event can endow some benefits for some industries, I would argue that this can lead to several drawbacks for the individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
- Task 2 The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of people 67
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Task 2 It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Task 2 What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth What are solutions for these problems 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'activities'' or 'activity's'?
Suggestion: activities'; activity's
...er words, allocating resources to these activities means more indigent residents have to s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, by the way, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76351351351 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29077639423 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614864864865 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7741439666 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.090909091 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9090909091 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20531222101 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814882907284 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602840725541 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138153794261 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601036345897 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.