• Task 2: Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets. Others, however, think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In some opinions, it is advisable for governments to pour money into searching for life on other planets. However, some argue that is wasteful and we should focus on problems on earth. I am neutral with those two attitudes.
On the one hand, looking for life on other planets is beneficial for human’s life in the future. To begin with, if life is discovered on other planets, people’s living space increases remarkably, which is vital for humans. Nowadays, because the population escalates sharply and the environment deals with pollution, people more and more want to find a new planet to settle in. In addition, discovering life on other planets is a way to expand knowledge about science, especially about the galaxy. That is always a mystery for humans and if they discover something new on other planets, they can apply that in order to improve life on earth such as planting new herbs.
On the other hand, that is believed to be unreasonable and they should spend money solving problems on earth for many reasons. First, although searching about life on other planets requires a lot of money, the result seems unsuccessful and we can not find any sign of life outside earth. That situation occurs for many decades and people can not witness any significant discoveries. Second, there are so many problems on earth what need money to help people directly. For example, in some countries in Africa, people suffer from poverty, war, homelessness and they need to be provided money to escape from that condition. Moreover, millions of patients need money to access treatment for diseases.
In conclusion, some people say that the government ought to take money to find life on other planets, whereas others want them to pay attention to issues on earth instead of that. In my opinion, the government should allocate money properly in both aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-21 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | hien3112 | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | hien3112 | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- Task 1 The chart below shows the percentage of a drug company s total sales by region from 2002 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Task 2 Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 1 The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- Task 2 Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have much higher salaries than other workers in a company To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Task 1 The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975 1995 and 2015
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62429352442 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0888411187 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425214670381 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145119393624 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755159237248 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270553846788 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437356648162 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62429352442 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0888411187 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425214670381 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145119393624 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755159237248 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270553846788 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437356648162 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.