Technological innovations in this 21st century have caused more harm than good. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Technological developments over the past few decades have dramatically changed the world we live in. Although the majority of people believe that machinery innovation has made people’s lives easier, some argue that it can exert an adverse impact on human life. Personally, I strongly agree with the former viewpoint which champions the merits of technology.
Firstly, the breakthrough in term of technology has made a substantial contribution to the improvement of people’s health. Medical device advance takes vital roles in healthcare from measuring blood pressure to conducting complex surgery. For instance, people who suffer from brain tumors which used to be incurable in the past, are now given hope for recovery with the help of modern medical machines. Despite the fact that many argue that human health much depends on healthy lifestyle which is the key factor to longevity, statistics show that people average age has significantly improved, especially in the developed countries in which technology has greatly innovated. It is therefore clear that improved technology can lead to the increased healthcare quality.
Second, the 21st century has witnessed the huge achievement in Internet and computer science which brings about an endless lists of benefits for human life including education. Internet advance makes knowledge accessible to learner regardless of educational background and allows learning and teaching to be viable during natural disaster or pandemic. A good example is the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic which has made learning and teaching impossible in classrooms. However, with the help of computers and Internet connection, knowledge is continually transferred to learners at the most stringent time. Although many people argue that Internet development leads to detrimental impacts on young people, I believe that young generation can make judicious choice to minimize the negative effect and take advantage of the 21st innovations.
In consideration of the abovementioned viewpoints, I strongly disagree with the idea that technological improvement causes more downsides than upsides. Despite some inevitable problems, technology innovations deserve what they have benefited our life. In the foreseeable future, technological advancement will continue to influence human world for both good and bad.
Technological developments over the past few decades have dramatically changed the world we live in. Although the majority of people believe that machinery innovation has made people’s lives easier, some argue that it can exert an adverse impact on human life. Personally, I strongly agree with the former viewpoint which champions the merits of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-12 | nguyenthikimsang | 73 | view |
- Technological innovations in this 21st century have caused more harm than good Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience 73
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Nowadays animal habitats are increasingly under threat from mining projects Some believe that stopping these projects to protect species is more important than proceeding whilst others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for 84
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'list'?
Suggestion: list
...r science which brings about an endless lists of benefits for human life including ed...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73383084577 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02632464802 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5142783613 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.315789474 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141552700799 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462498128419 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314632507215 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868876124429 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455761870164 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.