Teenagers should not be allowed to use mobile phones in schools. Do you agree or disagree? Give explanations and examples for your response.
Nowadays, smart phones become an important part of human life. Almost everyone has a smart phone, and high school students are no exception. They use it regularly, even in the classroom. In my opinion, high school students should not use phones in the classroom because it affects their studies, health, and disturbs others.
Students use the phone during class to affect their learning. They can not focus on listening to lectures, so the knowledge will have holes and fragments that are difficult to connect with each other, causing frustration when reviewing. That leads to unsatisfactory results, and it lasts semester if high school students don't know how to control their cell phone usage. Besides, the ability to focus is also reduced because they do two things at the same time: use the phone and listen to the teacher lecture.
The second effect of using the phone in the classroom is that the neck will be affected by sitting in the wrong place. In Vietnam, high schools do not let students use phones, so they have to use it stealthily. If you keep your head down continuously for many hours, the spine of your neck is under great pressure and can lead to serious damage. If this process continues continuously for many years, it can lead to paralysis of the arms, quadriplegic, and even paralysis of the respiratory muscles.
In closing, high school students using phones during class is not the right thing to do. Parents should strictly manage the time using the phone as well as work with the school to give the best possible solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-27 | Tran Thi Thuy Duong | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Tran Thi Thuy Duong | 78 | view |
- Teenagers should not be allowed to use mobile phones in schools Do you agree or disagree Give explanations and examples for your response 56
- In some countries people are spending long hours at the workplace Why does this happen Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Teenagers should not be allowed to use mobile phones in schools Do you agree or disagree Give explanations and examples for your response 78
- Today more people are travelling than ever before Why is this the case What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, smart phones become an importa...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... studies, health, and disturbs others. Students use the phone during class to a...
^^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... lasts semester if high school students dont know how to control their cell phone us...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one and listen to the teacher lecture. The second effect of using the phone in ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... paralysis of the respiratory muscles. In closing, high school students using p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, second, so, well, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49762168516 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563909774436 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4827851643 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25423812426 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944012768342 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051209942381 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168411673075 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492663916789 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.