Televisions influence the development of the creativity of children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Television is among the great inventions of humankind. With regard to the influence of television, some people believe that it has negative impacts on children's development of creativity. Personally, I disagree with this statement.
Firstly, television is an effective tool to boost children’s creativity. There are a wide range of TV programs on arts and handmade skills that cultivate children’s cognitive development, and creativity is a part of this development. For example, Arts House, a ten-year program on DIY (do-it-yourself), is exceptionally well-known in Vietnam for its creative contents. No matter how long it airs on TV, normally up to one and a half hour, the viewership is always high because of its extraordinarily impressive tips and tricks on making handmade stuffs. This instructs kids to make stuffs steps-by-steps, as a result, kids can practice at home and modify the instruction to create new things.
Secondly, television initiates children’s inspiration to discover new things. Programs like adventures or geography not only enlarge children’s knowledge but they also enhance children's motivation to research deeper insight nature and science. Take National Geographic, a TV channel, has many kid-friendly contents to circulate knowledge on nature to the under-16 age group, for example.
However, those who feel television negatively affects the growth of children might argue that there are a number of improper programs that have bad effects on children by its violence or pornography. To the most part, the competent authority shall have obligation to prohibit such contents by strict policies.
In conclusion, I believe that television will not influence children’s creativity. But meanwhile, the government and parents should prevent the unhealthy contents from airing on TV at their best effort.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?. 78
- Televisions influence the development of the creativity of children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both t 73
- The charts show subway and bus ridership and urban population density in 3 cities in 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Simon Essays) 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, I disagree with this statement. Firstly, television is an effective tool...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e instruction to create new things. Secondly, television initiates children&...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he under-16 age group, for example. However, those who feel television negat...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t such contents by strict policies. In conclusion, I believe that television...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78057553957 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39124702572 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643884892086 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2511018896 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.133333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203654727743 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06975418762 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585147786813 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112536341452 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382246613613 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.