In their advertising, the businesses nowadays usually emphasis that there products are new in some way. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Modern businesses, with their objective of being different from their competitors always focus on their ‘Unique Selling Point’, which represents how the product is distinct from their counterparts belonging to the same category. One of the reason could be to entice customers by solving the problem that the customers faced while using the similar product made by the peers. Hence, in my opinion, it is a positive development.
Businesses want to flourish from their old traditional marketing, which focuses on concocting new products in order to solve the common problems the users face, to the modern advertising which emphasizes on the prime feature which eradicates the existing challenge by modifying the same product and without making a new product specifically for the solution. This is because, implementing the former strategy is sometimes strenuous for businesses to devise new products frequently and it is time consuming whereas the latter method just solves the challenge users face while using the product and modifying them keeping the integrity and the ease of access of that product. Thus, businesses want to strictly emphasis on their new developments in advertisements.
Nowadays, advertisements have never been futile due to the fact that there are a numerous source of introducing the product in the market such as social media and influencer marketing. Viewers prefer short, crisp and blunt advertisements which are laconic which effectively communicates a business’ USP. By focusing on the main features of the product which makes them unique from the rest, it abates the marketing charges as the duration of advertisement is small and it helps obviate the distraction cause by the minute long advertisements, eventually making them persuasive.
To conclude, businesses should focus on promoting how the product is unique from the rest because it can benefit them economically as well as improves the persuasiveness of the product.
- Some people think that the government should spend more money on public service rather than wasting money on arts To what extent do you agree 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 73
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 58
- The maps show changes in the local industrial village in England called Stamdorf between 1985 and 2015 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the peers. Hence, in my opinion, it is a positive development. Businesses want...
^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sources'?
Suggestion: sources
...e to the fact that there are a numerous source of introducing the product in the marke...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and influencer marketing. Viewers prefer short, crisp and blunt advertisements wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44918032787 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04955752999 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56393442623 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.070664928 49.4020404114 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.2 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229680624059 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985103224442 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630433614001 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131583689975 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620929455064 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.