There is a growing recognition that young individuals tend to be impacted by same-aged people. I believe that the merits from the phenomenon would overshadow its drawbacks.
There are two major pitfalls originated from the implication that young people have on each other. The first issue is that by acknowledging the success of other peers, young people may feel inferior to their counterparts. This leads to the lack of confidence among the young and makes them feel difficult to socialize. Their social lives suffer as a result. An additional downsize is that, the impacts of extrinsic factors tend to more severe on young people, whose psychological development is still incomplete. This prevents them from achieving their personal goals and even quitting their on-going deeds which holds the key for their later feat in life. Thus, peer pressure takes its toll on the natural growth of youngster, which not only impairs their socialbility but discourages them from obtaining their objectives.
Apart from negative outcomes, peer pressure may act as a driving force for the self-development of many young people. The first merit from the phenomenon is that youngsters may immitate their more successful friends' pattern of behaviors which implies the success of one later in life. Secondly, given over-confident attitudes of young individuals, they would be encouraged to bridge the gap with their friends while their flourishment. More importantly, peer pressure often goes hand in hand with competition, the element plays a crucial role in any developed community, which motivates ones to work hard, and become more well-rounded individuals. The success of certain young individuals exerts positive influences on people at their age, which provides the ordinary with encouragement, role models and competion.
In the light of these facts, I concur with the view that the advantage of peer pressure is weightier than its disadvantages. the pressure from same-aged people is one of main precursors to the progession of ones in life, albeit there are some minor pitfalls affecting their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 593, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... personal goals and even quitting their on-going deeds which holds the key for their lat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...re is weightier than its disadvantages. the pressure from same-aged people is one o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36633663366 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9221659613 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1487667231 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184079010772 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645388504546 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400739145153 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122542129924 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100919885958 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.