These days the fashions in clothing are constantly changing. Is this affecting individuals and the environment in positive or a negative way. Give reasons for your answer and support by giving examples.
In this glamorous world, innovation in the fashion styles has become the order of the day. Presently, latest and exclusive trends in wearing styles are coming into existence. Undeniable, this development has few positives; however, I still believe that this brings more negative outcomes for individuals and environment. This essay intends to prove it a negative development with valid logics and examples.
There are numerous points to endorse my point of view. First and the foremost, constant changes in the styles of wearing attires makes people extravagant and it further leads to burden on the pocket of masses. To demonstrate, nowadays, fashion in terms of wearing clothes keeps changing very frequently and therefore people are subjected to buy clothes on regular basis to stay updated with latest trends. Sometime, they do not need to buy clothes but they have to purchase new attire to remain updated with the society. Needless to say, people are turning to become spendthrift and it surely imbalances their household financial budget.
Further emphasizing on my point of view,
frequent changes in clothing fads causes numerous environment concerns. To illustrate, fashion industry has to maximize their productions because of changes in the designs or styles almost every week. In this way, a massive amount of natural resources are used by clothing industries in order to produce clothes with innovative stuff and designs. This practice results in exploitation of natural resources and production of waste as well as pollution during manufacturing in clothing industries.
In addition, buying outfits excessively leads to replacement of old clothes with new attires. As a result, old clothes are often thrown to landfill sites or burnt and the environment gets contaminated under this approach. It is, therefore, clear that this trend invites colossal disadvantages for our ecology.
To recapitulate, there is no doubt, introduction of new wearing trends uplifts the standard of human lifestyle. However, in my perception, "excess of everything is bad". Frequent changes in styles without having the real needs suppresses the financial budget of individuals and natural resources. For this reason, it is a negative development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-23 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Justin | 74 | view |
- Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Nowadays young people prefer going to shopping centres rather than spending their time in organised activities such as sport or music Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons to support your opinion using your own knowledge a 81
- " success means the desire was strong enough". To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer? 80
- Some people believe that manufacturersand supermarkets should minimise thepackaging material used. However, othersthink that consumers should avoidheavily packaged goods. Discuss bothviews and give your opinion. 53
- Some people think that governments should provide subsidies to farmers to produce cheap healthy food. Others think that governments should tax companies producing unhealthy foods. Give your own opinion and examples. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...lothes on regular basis to stay updated with latest trends. Sometime, they do not need to b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...es their household financial budget. Further emphasizing on my point of view, freq...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Further emphasizing on my point of view, frequent changes in clothing fads causes...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, as to, in addition, no doubt, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51873198847 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9620510037 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567723342939 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.781838969 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226668353795 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678041068182 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606552099437 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10352660454 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540107237011 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.