These days, the gap between the rich and the poor is steadily increasing, thus affecting negatively the lives of millions. Why is this happening? What can be done to reduce it?
In recent years, the wealth devide has been becoming increasingly significant and has become a disservice in poor people’s lives. I believe that knowledge imbalance and taxation play a pivotal role in this issue. As such, corresponding measures should be formulated by governments to tackle this ongoing problem.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that education is the key factor leading to a successful career as well as having a high income. However, poor people clearly have less access to a great educational system in comparison to their rich peers. As a result, if there is no improvement on the poor’s knowledge, the gap will become wider. Furthermore, there is an inequality of taxation policy that is being imposed on the poor by some governments. This is because most politicians are the rich, therefore, they issue bills or policies beneficial for them. As such, this irony makes the rich get richer and impoverish the poor.
Fortunately, there are several solutions which could be devised by governments to narrow this pace. Firstly, authorities should adjust their country’s educational policy by establishing national education funds and providing subsidies to poor students. This plan assure that the students from poor backgrounds could have an equal access to every level of education, thereby improving their lives. Secondly, countries’ tax policy should be reformed. On the one hand, governments should raise taxes levied on products that are usually consumed by the wealthy such as jewelry or luxurious car. At the same time, the taxes imposed on basic necessities such as energy or food should be reduced to decrease the financial burden to the poor.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my position that knowledge imbalance and tax inequality are two main factors causing the growing gap between the rich and the poor. Consequently, governments should have some reformations on educational and tax policy to address it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | khanhnguyen97 | 78 | view |
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 73
- These days, the gap between the rich and the poor is steadily increasing, thus affecting negatively the lives of millions. Why is this happening? What can be done to reduce it? 78
- Living in big cities is bad for people’s health. Do you agree or disagree? 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'assures'.
Suggestion: assures
...g subsidies to poor students. This plan assure that the students from poor backgrounds...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'equal access'.
Suggestion: equal access
...udents from poor backgrounds could have an equal access to every level of education, thereby im...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... At the same time, the taxes imposed on basic necessities such as energy or food should be reduce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31309904153 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02934034038 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584664536741 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.771912636 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8235294118 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158129566104 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551365142063 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362675773724 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997372328565 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247536535611 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.