In cutting edge these days more spread garbage on roads and plenty places. However, in the past, individuals used to repair damaged things and keep them for long period, while people are want to throw damaged product in towards time. This essay will put forth the causative factors and describe the adverse impacts.
To embark with, certain grounds can be held responsible for throw damaged goods. To elaborate, although these days product are easily broken, due to people are thrown it, since if they do repair of the products, while after they can not use them. Owing to, they want to purchase new ones. Apart from this, dearth of time. To explain, people have a hectic lifestyle, due to, they have not time for retrospect. Irrefutably it is common that people buy newly goods compared to last year. Thus, it is a easiest trend for people life.
Furthermore, owing to this effect, few clear detrimental ramifications can be derived. Firstly, the damaged items, due to bad impact on natural environment. However, the people more use of plastic product and they drop on vacant places, because the plastic product, which can not recycled and it is enough to increase pollution in environment, due to the tremendously spread of the alments. Secondly, the enough death of the animal, because who animal live on the outside area, sometimes they eat plastic products, due to they are death of it. Hence, the plastic product more bad for human and animal lives.
To conclude, it is evident that there are serval causes and a variety of negative effects on people, society must ensure steps are taken to prevent this problem increasing future.
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on Earth Some people think that more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Alternative sources that use the natural power of wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below gives information about population of over 60 year olds in six regions in 2000 and the predicted number of population over 60 in 2050 It also shows the world population over 60 in 2000 and 2050 Summarise the information in the following th 84
- The charts give information about world forest in six different regions
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...ged goods. To elaborate, although these days product are easily broken, due to peopl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...oods compared to last year. Thus, it is a easiest trend for people life. Furth...
^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...oods compared to last year. Thus, it is a easiest trend for people life. Furth...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94223826715 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43260766555 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581227436823 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.028870906 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5625 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247334664454 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787503641368 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795796255239 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157330729338 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103394655881 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.