These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?
Compared to the past, the role of nurturing their children has become ambiguous according to the growth of women's social status. I would argue this phenomenon has a beneficial influence
on both community and individual.
When it comes to causes of why the responsibilities have changed, the most important factor is the change of the people awareness. Scientists say that the number of people who reckon that the raising a child is not entirely for women tasks has become in a rise.
In the past, the gap between the position of mother and father was clearly divided because of general bias that female always have to behave modestly, doing household chores like wash the dishes, cook, take care of a child. However, this was completely altered since mothers go out to work, it is another element I am going to talking about. The survey institution said that there is no difference the level of achievement when they are charged with the same task.
Both community and individual are impacted positively by this phenomenon. As for the community, as the number of economically active population is expected to increase, there may be fluctuations of our economy. On the other hand, for the personal perspective, A household can keep peaceful by understanding mutual difficulties.
They realize how hard he/she have a burden like teaching a rebellious child, nagging from a boss. For example, the divorce lawyer said that the most case he/she is faced with is the absence of comprehension.
For the reasons mentioned above, I would argue that the transition of caretaking role has an important key in shaping the better world. because we have ended up with the equality
of sexes.
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 77
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 91
- In many countries the governement spends a lot of money on the internet network.Some people believe it isn't a right decision. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to in 2000 and 2010 79
- Many employees prefer working from home using modern technologies. However, the employers don't consider it as a benefit. Discuss both points and give your own opinion with relevant examples from your experience. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 30, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...culties. They realize how hard he/she have a burden like teaching a rebellious chi...
^^^^
Line 10, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...ortant key in shaping the better world. because we have ended up with the equality of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ortant key in shaping the better world. because we have ended up with the equality of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, as for, for example, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02135231317 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8242105886 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3625371686 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165296662887 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459432334265 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464281785064 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585713111167 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547961909508 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.