These days people in some countries are living in a 'throw-away' society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. What causes and what are the problems?
Nowadays, more and more people in the world have been concerning public attention about a controversial issue which is the consumption and waste of people increasingly in a short time. This essay would demonstrate some causes and consequences of this problem.
There are several reasons that explain why people buy more and throw away more. First and Foremost, the birth of social network influence directly on the demand of people in shopping such as online advertisements are tailored to the individual. This means that this spurs people’s demand. Secondly, the mass production makes item’s price more affordable and competitive and the increase in average incomes is also a factor which enables people to buy even more. All these causes lead to the social phenomenon of overconsumption and the problem of waste when things are thrown away.
The overconsumption and thrown-away society are linked to some serious consequence. Firstly, the mass production results in about the overuse of natural gases. Worse, it leads to gas emission which cause global warming. Secondly, the impulsive buying êxerts in the waste problem which pollutes every corner on the earth. As a sad truth, plastic is one of a non- degradable materials which kills numerous species of marine animals in great quantities. Last but not least, the consumer spending would take its toll on the budget for some top priorities such as education, healthcare problem and investment. Properly, it also makes them miss an opportunity to become richer and even, plunge into the mire of debt.
For the reasons mentioned above, a thrown-away culture would wreak some devastations not only the environment but also the budget of the individual.
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 78
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... more and more people in the world have been concerning public attention about a controversial ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in great quantities. Last but not least, the consumer spending would take its tol...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29562043796 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85444626825 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594890510949 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6846836959 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2782149064 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083222049008 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550960749803 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151936173111 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580016567516 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.