The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.
The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, nuclear power is an essential part of the New World. It is commonly believed that the devastating power from atoms delivers world peace, sustain the stabilization of the Earth and also comes with low-cost and eco-friendly type of energy.
Firstly, the ability of atomic bombs to keep the world war-free has been proved for so many times. An A-Bomb can kill everything within its blast radius. Due to the enormous impact, countries are likely considered that the use of nuclear weapons is the last solution they can come up with. Furthermore, these types of weapons acts as a great warning message to other nations worldwide, to raise fear to our own enemies. Back to the year of 1945, we can clearly see what Fat Man and Little Boy had done to Japan. These two forced the Imperial to surrender unconditionally, ended the second world war tragedy.
For the next reason, nuclear energy is the best source of alternative energy resource. The shortage of fossil power source is growing rapidly, especially coal and oil. On the other hand, atoms produced no exhaust, can be found literally anywhere and can be recreated in the lab. According to research from LaCai newspaper, the energy of 10 grams of uranium is equaled to 100 tons of charcoal and 60 tons of oil. Moreover, a nuclear power plant is extremely quiet. Compared to hydro-electric power plants, the noise of a nuclear power plant produced is 150 times lower. Living in a big city , these small particles enable the chance to cut down the manufacturing cost, also wipe away the noise and toxic smoke.
In conclusion, nuclear energy is a thing we should invest our time on more. However, we must used use this energetic beast with extreme care, or else we will see a New Age coming in no time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | Szprawstyle | 84 | view |
| 2018-01-31 | sujan chava | 78 | view |
| 2016-07-04 | Fatemeam | 56 | view |
| 2016-07-03 | Bhavkeerat singh dhillon | 67 | view |
| 2016-07-01 | Julian | 67 | view |
- The flowchart below shows the process of making recycled bottles.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people are fond of buying new gadgets phones or laptops Is this a good or bad thing Discuss your opinion 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...is 150 times lower. Living in a big city , these small particles enable the chance...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58627409112 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6555933232 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173705871074 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586966727687 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615077439577 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104600949663 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463139646542 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.