Today, advanced science and technology have made great changes to people's life, but artists are still valued high such as musicians, painters and writers. What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
It is technological revolution rather than arts. which are thought highly of for providing empirical data and practical solutions to problems, that brings out variations in our lifestyle and anything relevant. Still, various forms of arts offer a unique perspective on life that any technique cannot replicate.
The arts explore the emotional depth of human experiences in a way that science and technology cannot. Works of art such as literature, music, painting, dance, theater, and film can convey the range of human emotions with acute precision and sensitivity. A scientific or technological solution may solve a problem practically, but it cannot capture the complex emotional landscape of human experience.
Science and technology aim to solve problems, whereas art is often concerned with beauty and aesthetics. The beauty of art arises from its ability to inspire wonder or reflect the complexity of the world around us, offering insight into how we see and understand our environment. The ability to create beauty and craft objects that are aesthetically pleasing is both a human instinct and a reflection of cultural identity.
Art reflects and shapes culture, providing insight into cultural practices, beliefs, and values. Whether it be music, literature, or visual art, works of art serve as a record of human thought, feelings, and ideas over time. Art offers a window into human history, and by studying different cultures' artworks, we can gain insights into the values and norms by which they live.
In conclusion, while science and technology are vital to improving the material conditions of our lives, they cannot convey the emotional depth, aesthetics, and cultural significance conveyed by the arts. As humans, our ability to create, interpret, and appreciate art offers an essential means of communication, connection, and understanding of ourselves, our emotions and our place in the world.
- More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop e g iPad because they think that children need good technology skills Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries secondary schools provide a general education of a range of education In other countries children have a narrow range of subjects relating to a particular career Which one do you think is more appropriate for the modern world 89
- Today advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists are still valued high such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...hnological revolution rather than arts. which are thought highly of for providing emp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...to create beauty and craft objects that are aesthetically pleasing is both a human instinct and a reflecti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44481605351 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98335257941 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581939799331 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 0.809619238477 1112% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7636918278 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190981150225 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729596453935 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550893104351 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105547002141 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356077537903 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.