Today family members do not eat meals together Why does this happen Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Essay topics:

Today family members do not eat meals together. Why does this happen? Is this a positive or negative development

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In today's rapid growing world, families all over the globe hardly get time to eat meals together due to numerous reasons. This factor has widely raised questions whether this development is affecting families in a negative or positive way. This essay will discuss certain reasons which has given rise to this situation and it's impact on society.

Overall, the most common reason that individuals hardly receive time to spend with their family is hectic life. The increased workload and irregular office hours results in dissipation of daily routine and individuals have to compromise their timing of eating. While punctual people who follow their routine don't wait for anyone as it may disrupt their routine. So It's becomes difficult to have meal together when family has such individuals making such situations common and neglectable for them.

However, some people opine that it is a positive development while others say that it's negative. Having meals together can lead to healthy communication between families which can improve bonding. In contrast, it helps nurturing pupils with moral values and culture to ensure that these ancestral principles don't fade away. On the contrary, eating meals individually creates a sense of self-sufficiency which is also a good sign as the person isn't dependent on others to serve him or wash his plates. Moreover, having meals on time keeps a person in good condition, mentally as well as physically.

In conclusion, having meals with or without family have their own positive and negative attributes but not eating together in fine unless a healthy communication is maintained amongst family and doesn't lead to depreciation of traditional values.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-01-18 Killua 73 view
2022-01-10 ntth492 61 view
2022-01-05 Awadhesh Mourya 56 view
2021-12-22 mrinal 61 view
2021-03-17 elisabetta_fedele 73 view
Essays by user mrinal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...unctual people who follow their routine dont wait for anyone as it may disrupt their...
^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to nurture' or 'nurture'.
Suggestion: to nurture; nurture
... improve bonding. In contrast, it helps nurturing pupils with moral values and culture to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... ensure that these ancestral principles dont fade away. On the contrary, eating meal...
^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally creates a sense of self-sufficiency which is also a good sign as the person ...
^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...which is also a good sign as the person isnt dependent on others to serve him or was...
^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cation is maintained amongst family and doesnt lead to depreciation of traditional val...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34944237918 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73327500951 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609665427509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3760430462 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.692307692 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21461515046 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749388849738 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628957807968 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141116689295 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782751992954 0.056905535591 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.