Today more and more people use robots to do tasks at home and at work Do you think it is a positive or negative development Why

Essay topics:

Today, more and more people use robots to do tasks at home and at work. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? Why?

Considering the current technological advancements, robots are being used more frequently for doing activities which in the past were done by hand. I believe that doing various jobs and activities at home as well as at work with the help of machines have its positives and negatives. The reason for my opinion has been discussed in the following passages.

Undoubtedly, employing robotics is more efficient and safer than doing certain tasks by hand. For example, using robots in hazardous environments such as mines is safer rather than using manual labour force for mining operations. Moreover, machines can work continuously without stopping for rest as they do not get tired and therefore, can get more work done in the same amount of time without any danger to human life. Due to these reasons in certain scenarios where there may be some danger to life, machines are a more sensible option than employing people in those situations.

However, use of robots and machines also has numerous demerits. Dependance on robots is slowly killing the livelihood of a lot of skilled and un-skilled labour. In the past, almost all the accessories and tools which people use in their day to day life, were produced by skilled workers and various other mundane tasks were done by un-skilled labour. But nowadays, almost everything is being manufactured with the help of robots and there is a machine for almost every simple task which people perform in their daily routine such as cleaning robots for cleaning homes and offices, machines for washing laundry etcetera. This situation has resulted in ending numerous skilled and un-skilled jobs around the world. The use of machines for performing day to day tasks has also resulted in making people lazier.

Conclusively, the use of robots has its advantages in being more productive and safer along with demerits such as ending a number of skilled and un-skilled jobs and making people lazy.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (8 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-05 llrasthy J 80 view
2021-11-08 bangtaenie_77 89 view
2021-08-08 Komaldeep 51 view
2021-07-21 minhpn 67 view
2021-03-02 charanjeetsinghsappal 75 view
Essays by user charanjeetsing… :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65349715649 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510971786834 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3191574744 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267550260958 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987391533328 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749392010314 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177029873712 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072343919043 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.