Today parents spend little free time with their children. Why is it the case? Who are more affected: parents or children?
In this fast-paced modern life, the precious time between parents and their offspring has become scarcer and scarcer. Within the framework of this writing, an elaboration on the reasons leading to the matter will be provided before evaluating the influence that this phenomenon has.
To commence with, one major cause of the problem is modern technology. Admittedly, it draws the attention of both adults and children, indirectly taking away their family bonding time and interpersonal interactions. It can easily be found in a family’s living room that the fosterers together are watching television programs and gossiping about their day while their kids are hooked on smartphones and gaming consoles. Although technological devices offer profound overall merits to our daily life, it is undeniable that they are pushing flesh and blood relationships far away. Moreover, another root to this case may stem from the parents themselves, who are under pressure to earn every single penny to make ends meet. The ever-calling desire of catering for their babies makes them workaholics so that they lack time and care for those who should have been their top priorities.
The remaining part will discuss the issue’s impact on the two groups. It is difficult to gauge as both are affected in their own way. Children without sufficient guidance and supervision in their upbringing may eventually become spoiled young adults, indulging themselves in drugs and social crimes. However, their adaptation to childhood hardships can result in early independence and resilience. Parents tend to suffer from the feeling of guiltiness since they fail to fulfill their responsibilities, and arguments between spouses may usually occur when one is trying to blame the other. Therefore, middle-aged divorces have seen an upward trend these days, especially in dysfunctional families.
In a nutshell, advanced technology and money-making pressure are the main reasons for the aforementioned situation. As a consequence, both the young and the grown-up are equally influenced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-26 | phamkhuyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | Linhharty | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | puson | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51886792453 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96480682446 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650943396226 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6547176717 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6875 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206997084016 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535601833826 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489991382024 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979776837675 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679192208934 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.