Today people are wasting large amounts of food.
Why?
What can be done to reduce the amount of food wasted?
It is documented that the amount of wasted food is proliferating to an alarming degree and the prominent cause for such development is the excessive purchase of food. Therefore, one of the viable solutions to this is to teach people to become wise consumers and how to use food more efficiently.
Since the advent of food technology, humans have devised numerous scientific techniques, such as gene modification technology, to produce food in vast quantity, and although this has substantially allayed the concern over food scarcity across the world, it has also given rise to enormous food wastage. This stems from the fact that a cascade of promotions and advertisements have been done by malls or supermarkets to entice buyers to spend on products, especially perishable ones such as dairy products, produce and meat, so as to keep the inventory at manageable levels. However, this has simultaneously resulted in greater food wastage, as people are apt to buy more than they can consume, which is readily evident in many Vietnamese households nowadays after their family feasts.
To address such issue thoroughly, a nationwide media campaign against the immoderate use of food should be launched. Such activity ought to aim at raising the public awareness of the consequences of huge amount of wasted food on the environment and personal finances to help people reconsider their buying behaviors and more importantly, become discerning buyers. Moreover, people as well as food and beverage serving establishments need to be equipped with knowledge about how to recycle or reuse the leftover for other useful purposes. To illustrate, damaged parts of vegetables and food scraps can be collected to make compost heaps which serve as nutrient-rich fertilizer for gardening or farming, thus not only effectively curbing the amount of food waste but also forming a positive feedback loop in terms of production and consumption.
In conclusion, the dramatic scientific advancements in food industry have fostered greater food production, ultimately leading to overbuying in certain countries, and consequently, a host of remedies, primarily based on changes in consumer behaviors and ways of handling food waste, should be implemented.
- some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Ohers however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety 84
- The World of Work Is Rapidly Changing and Employees Cannot Depend On Having the Same Work or The Same Working Conditions for Life What Are the Causes and Ways to Prepare People to Work in The Future 95
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but other think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The culture of different countries is becoming increasingly similar so there is no point for people to go traveling abroad as they could have the same experience at home Do you agree or disagree 93
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ch as dairy products, produce and meat, so as to keep the inventory at manageable levels...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41142857143 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07882829555 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.746684509 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.4 106.682146367 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 20.7667163134 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356579012293 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139730622176 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699768677995 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215738817491 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715108882534 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.0946893788 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.