In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
It is true that artists such as musicians, painters and writers have still gained a great deal of respect from their audiences and readers in spite of the dominance of advanced science and technology. Personally, I think the role of art is irreplaceable because it conveys many meaningful messages about life such as the mental development and literary appreciation which science and technology fail to.
First, art would significantly contribute to the mental development of individuals. In fact, literary works could help their admirers to realize what they need to do for their lives after reading every page thoroughly. In particular, when they face difficulty in both their professional life and private life, art would enable them to hide themselves from the harsh reality and find their inner peace. To illustrate, “Hat giong tam hon” is one of the most impressive self-help books readers, especially teenagers, could choose to get themselves in during their life crisis. This book provides them with valuable life lessons and eye-opening experiences which they could find with science and technology. This helps them to overcome challenges in life and somehow shape their personality traits in a more holistic manner.
Second, art could improve a great appreciation for the culture and history which artists try to express in their works. As a matter of fact, the culture and history are two of the main sources of creation materials and become a big part in the arts industry. This not only strengthens understanding about different cultures and history in many parts of the world but also promotes a sense of identity. Take Vietnam as a concrete example, many Vietnamese literary works such as fairy tales or poems and folk songs pass from generation to generation through bedtime storytelling of grandparents or parents. This practically preserves our cultures and history and allows young people to understand traditional values. By contrast, innovation and modern breakthroughs are the main focus of science and technology, which guides humans to live for the present and future only.
To conclude, in my view, art is of great significance in the sense of mentality and identity which science and technology cannot.
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 89
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
- The graph below shows the average daily spending of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
... materials and become a big part in the arts industry. This not only strengthens und...
^^^^
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...vation and modern breakthroughs are the main focus of science and technology, which guides...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, then, i think, in fact, in particular, such as, as a matter of fact, in my view, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26890756303 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88155931723 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574229691877 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7149206293 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234294051311 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748913831591 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725853624579 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175404751194 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975078207765 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.