There have been a significant change in the way we communicate over the last 2 decades, and majority of people have mobile phones to text messages with each other. But is it useful?
Firstly, applications such as, Facebook, Skype, and Twitter helps people to send messages instantly to their friends. Therefore, they no longer need to write letters which takes few weeks to deliver to the houses. This method is beneficial as it helps to save money and give flexibility of time.
However, there are some downsides using those gadgets which can cause spelling errors while texting. One of the main reasons is because teenagers often use abbreviations or make their own words such as "LOL" instead of "laugh out loud". Moreover, some punctuation might be missing. In my school, for example, students write words in short form during writing examination, like when they are chatting with their friends in social media. Thus, their grades are affected and end up getting low marks.
Yet this issue does not matter as long as adolescents know what they are writing. Furthermore, it is an informal email which means messages between friends. As a result, the language change among teenagers have booned their convenience of communication. But that does not mean that they have to do the same when writing emails to officials. In other words clear and precise text must be submitted to people with high superiority.
In conclusion, although the Internet have improved the way we interact with people, we should not forget that the way we reply messages can influence the usage of vocabulary.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in short, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73716377694 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4845100448 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5625 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237824799702 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725911625556 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660660560834 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120718263789 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674017549977 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.